Pika Art 2.2

Pika has released version 2.2, and the big question is—is it better than the previous versions?Alongside this release, they’ve also introduced Pick Frames (covered separately). Below we focus on what Pika 2.2 offers and how it compares against earlier versions.
What is Pika Art 2.2?
Pika Art 2.2 is the latest release of Pika’s AI video model. It aims to improve animation quality, realism, and consistency over its previous versions. However, during testing, some unexpected results came up, showing both progress and setbacks compared to versions like 2.1.
Pika Art Versions Overview
Same prompt for all versions: "model walking down the city street with pink gloves."

Version | Result |
---|---|
1.0 | Very basic, early attempt. The model looked rough but showed potential. |
1.5 | Huge improvement, much better than 1.0. |
2.0 | Cleaner, more natural movement. |
2.1 | Improved again with more realistic touches. |
2.2 | Disappointing—movement isn’t as natural, gloves and hands morph strangely. |
This shows that 2.2 doesn’t always outperform 2.1 and in some cases, feels like a step backward.
Key Features of Pika 2.2
- Updated model with new training data.
- Aims to produce more realistic motion.
- Handles complex prompts (animals, characters, interactions).
- Introduced alongside Pick Frames (separate feature).





Testing Pika 2.2 With Prompts
Test 1: Husky Running Through a Daisy Field
- 2.0: Decent but some morphing issues.
- 2.1: Better, more natural look.
- 2.2: More illustrative, less realistic, still morphing issues.
👉 Verdict: 2.1 looks better than 2.2 here.

Test 2: Knight Fighting a Chicken
- 2.1 (Pika): More realistic, though morphing present.
- 2.2 (Pika): Chicken looks cartoonish and unnatural.
- Polo AI: Knight fine, chicken more realistic (interaction imperfect).
- Google VO2: Awkward half-knight, chicken too small but moves somewhat naturally.
- Kling 1.6: More realistic overall; some morphing on chicken.
👉 Verdict: Pika 2.2 fell backward toward a cartoon-like result.

Test 3: Blonde Model Eating Ice Cream With Hockey Gloves
- Pika 2.2: Strange mouth; face and cone don’t blend naturally.
- Pika 2.1: Gloves closer to correct; eating messy; duplicated cones.
- Pika 1.5: Slow-motion, less natural.
- Polo AI: Better eating motion; gloves wrong.
- Kling: Blue hockey-like gloves; eating somewhat normal.
- Google VO2: Elements present but overall looks very strange.
👉 Verdict: All struggled; 2.2 may be slightly better than 1.5 in this case.

Step-by-Step Guide to Using Pika Art 2.2
- Log in to Pika platform — use your account to access the latest model.
- Select the Pika 2.2 model — ensure tests run on the new version.
- Enter your prompt — e.g., “Model walking down a city street with pink gloves”.
- Generate video output — wait for rendering to finish.
- Review and compare — check realism of movement and objects.
- Try multiple prompts — animals, eating actions, hand movements.
- Compare with other tools (optional) — Polo AI, Kling, Google VO2.

Observations
- Movement Issues: Walking and eating prompts show unnatural morphing in 2.2.
- Realism Drop: Compared to 2.1, 2.2 often appears more cartoon-like.
- Animal Prompts: Struggles with realism (Husky and Chicken tests).
- Hand Prompts: Gloves morph or appear wrong frequently.
- Rollout Speed: Updates may be happening too quickly without refining.
FAQs
1. Is Pika 2.2 better than 2.1?
Not always. In some cases, 2.1 produces more realistic results than 2.2.
2. Why does Pika 2.2 look cartoonish?
It was likely trained on different datasets, which may have influenced the realism.
3. Should I switch to Pika 2.2 completely?
Test both 2.1 and 2.2. Some situations may work better in 2.2, others in 2.1.
4. How does Pika compare with Polo AI or Kling?
Polo AI and Kling often produced more realistic animals/interactions; Pika 2.2 leaned more illustrative.
5. What is Pick Frames?
A new feature announced alongside 2.2; to be covered separately.

Final Thoughts
Pika keeps updating rapidly. 2.2 brings changes—but not all are improvements. With tests like the walking model, Husky, knight and chicken, and the ice-cream prompt, 2.2 sometimes feels like a step back compared to 2.1.
It’s important to test prompts yourself and see what works best. AI models evolve quickly, and community feedback helps them improve.